The Wages of Wins Journal

Can the Heat Repeat?

February 15, 2007 · 11 Comments

“I ain’t as good as I once was.”

This might be the theme song for the aging stars of the Miami Heat in 2006-07. With a record of 26-26 heading into the All-Star game, Miami just doesn’t look like a team that will successfully defend its title.

Of course, for a champion, Miami was not the most successful regular season team in 2005-06. Last year the Heat only won 52 regular season games. As champions go, this win total is a bit on the low-side. Since 1980, only the Houston Rockets (in 1995) won a title with fewer regular season wins (on average, again since 1980, the average NBA champion has won close to 61 games in the regular campaign). So Miami was not one of the stronger champions in recent memory.

This season Miami is demonstrating that they are also not one of the stronger defending champions in recent memory. As noted, Miami has only won 50% of its games this season. To put that performance in perspective, since 1980 only the Chicago Bulls of 1998-99 failed to win at least 57% of their regular season games played the year after taking the title. And that Chicago team entered the season without the services of major talents like Michael Jordan, Dennis Rodman, or Scottie Pippen. So it was not surprising to see the Bulls struggle.

Unlike the Bulls of 1998-99, the Heat returned every single significant player from the team that took the title in 2006. Despite returning 13 players, though, Miami is still struggling to find consistent success. And the struggles seem related to the four veteran “stars” who agreed to return to Miami for another title.

Prior to Eddie Jones joining the roster a few weeks ago, the Heat had only four players with at least ten years of NBA experience: Shaquille O’Neal, Alonzo Mourning, Gary Payton, and Antoine Walker. Over the past ten years these four players have offered the following levels of Wins Produced and Wins Produced per 48 minutes [WP48]:

  • Shaquille O’Neal: 164.6 Wins Produced, 0.334 WP48
  • Alonzo Mourning: 75.8 Wins Produced, 0.222 WP48
  • Gary Payton: 121.4 Wins Produced, 0.199 WP48
  • Antoine Walker: 31.0 Wins Produced, 0.052 WP48

An average player offers a 0.100 WP48, so three of these players have historically been well above average.

This season, as highlighted in the following table, all four are playing much worse.

Table One: Four “Stars” for the Miami Heat

With respect to shooting efficiency, rebounds, and turnovers, all four players have declined from what we saw just last season. Not surprisingly, each player’s Win Score per minute and WP48 have also declined. If these players had maintained the level of productivity we observed last season, we would estimate an additional eight victories for this team. In other words, this team would be contending with the top teams in the East (though still off the pace from what we see from the Best in the West).

Although one suspects that age is taking its toll on Mourning and Payton, it can be argued that Shaq’s decline might be entirely due to his injury. Last year he missed 23 games, which was part of the reason the Heat failed to perform better in the 2005-06 regular season. This year he has already missed 39 games. Still, when he has played, Shaq is not anywhere near what he used to be.

And although injury might be Shaq’s story today, at some point we know he will also succumb to the ravages of time. Yes, even Shaq is going to reach a point where his age will prevent him from competing effectively in the NBA.

The good news for the Heat, as the following table illustrates, that even as these veteran “stars” age less than gracefully, there is still some younger talent on this roster.

Table Two: The Miami Heat After 52 Games

As the numbers illustrate, clearly this team is now Dwyane Wade’s team. As we saw in the analysis of the NBA after 41 games, Flash is currently the top shooting guard in the league. Wade, though, is not a one man team. The team is also receiving above average performances from James Posey and Dorell Wright. And Eddie Jones looks like he is still capable of being a very effective NBA player.

For this team to take the title, though, some of the four “stars” from the past are going to need to play better in the post-season. Certainly these players are not as good as they once were. But these players must hope that for each game in the playoffs they can be – as Toby Keith says – “as good once as they ever was.”

- DJ

Our research on the NBA was summarized HERE.

Wins Produced and Win Score are Discussed in the Following Posts

Simple Models of Player Performance

Wins Produced vs. Win Score

What Wins Produced Says and What It Does Not Say

Categories: Basketball Stories

11 responses so far ↓

  • Okapi // February 16, 2007 at 2:14 am

    Odds on TradeSports.com suggest the Heat and the Pistons are the most likely Eastern Conference teams to win the championship this year (7.5% – 8.0% chances apiece). Chicago is next at 5%.

    From the West, Dallas + Phoenix are each given about 20% – 25% chances of winning the championship.

  • HeatFan // February 16, 2007 at 7:11 am

    Uhh… Dorell Wright? James Posey? You completely failed to mention Jason Kapono, who’s been more effective than everyone except Zo and Wade. Wright hardly plays anymore anyways.And you failed to mention that JWill has been in/out all season long.

  • Sportszilla // February 16, 2007 at 10:57 am

    This is off-topic, but I just wrote a piece on my blog (http://www.sportszillablog.com/2007/02/whos_got_the_most_game.htm) about who should be the NBA MVP at this point, and I’m wondering if you think I’m using Win Score properly…

  • Huey // February 16, 2007 at 11:03 am

    Did you not look at the table, HeatFan?

  • dberri // February 16, 2007 at 11:53 am

    Sportszilla,
    That looks right to me. I think Marion has spent more time at power forward this year, but you are right that he is hard to pin down.

    I would add that your analysis completely ignore that team adjustment. And that is perfectly fine. Wins Score adjusted for position (which you did) and WP48 (which adjust for team stats) have a 0.994 correlation. In other words, these stats are virtually the same.

  • HeatFan // February 16, 2007 at 1:02 pm

    Huey,

    I looked at the table, but the point is there has to be something wrong because Wright only performed well for a very limited period of time when half the team was injured. Perhaps the Wins Produced score needs a better normalization to capture the fact that Wright has not kept this pace up AT ALL over the last two months, whereas Kapono has.

    Also, does WP normalize for minutes played? I mean, if someone goes 2-2 with a steal in 3 minutes, compared to someone who goes 6-10 with 2 steals in 30 minutes, who would get the higher WP score?

  • Charles Follymacher // February 17, 2007 at 1:03 am

    I have to second the cocked eyebrow at Kapono’s numbers. Why isn’t his wp48 higher? It just can’t be below average. Perhaps it’s avging over whole season and not the tear he’s been on since the beginning of this year (more minutes, consistently).

    disclaimer: of course i have him in my pool ;-)

  • dberri // February 17, 2007 at 7:52 am

    Charles,
    I have Kapono on my fantasy team as well. He gets you threes. But look at his rebounding (which I get from many other players on my fantasy team). Kapano is well below average in rebounding, and that doesn’t help.

    Huey,
    WP48 is what a player does per 48 minutes. Wins Produced or WP is a player’s total production. So in your example, the player who played 30 minutes has a higher WP score.

  • HeatFan // February 17, 2007 at 10:11 am

    dberri,

    does the 48 minutes mean per game or per 48 minutes played any time? because if it’s just 48 minutes played any time, then some scrub who plays really well for the 2 minutes he gets off the bench at the end of the game is going to ultimately (well, after 24 games) have a SICK WP48. but that doesn’t seem correct. please let me know. thanks.

  • cris // March 6, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    The prediction for the NBA finals
    Miami Heat and the Dallas Mavericks. Repeat of
    last year! Detroit doesnt have what it takes.

    Miami will win in 7 games.

  • Surviving Wade « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 16, 2007 at 1:36 pm

    [...] down with an injury about three weeks ago. At this time, the Miami Heat had a record of 26-27 and I had just analyzed the Heat’s chances to repeat. This analysis indicated that Wade was the team’s most productive player. Unfortunately several [...]

Leave a Comment