The Wages of Wins Journal

Two Great Entries at The Sports Economist

August 30, 2007 · 4 Comments

In addition to writing at The Wages of Wins Journal, I occasionally offer a comment at The Sports Economist. The Sports Economist is a blog created by Raymond (Skip) Sauer, a professor of economics at Clemson University. Skip put together a roster of sports economists to offer posts, which both spreads out the workload and also boosts the quality of columns offered.

Here is the current roster (in alphabetical order, not in order of talent).

David Berri, Associate Professor of Economics, California State University – Bakersfield
Dennis Coates, Professor of Economics, University of Maryland Baltimore County
Rodney Fort, Professor of Economics, Washington State University (now at the University of Michigan)
Brian Goff, Distinguished University Professor of Economics, Western Kentucky University
Brad Humphreys, Associate Professor, Department of Recreation, Sport, and Tourism, University of Illinois (now at the University of Alberta)
Victor Matheson, Assistant Professor of Economics, College of the Holy Cross
Phil Miller, Assistant Professor of Economics, Minnesota State University, Mankato
John Palmer, Professor of Economics, University of Western Ontario
Raymond Sauer, Professor of Economics, Clemson University
Stefan Szymanski, Professor of Economics, Imperial College London

Over the past two days, both Brian Goff and Phil Miller offered outstanding comments. Miller’s post was the following two sentences, which captures nicely the outrageous salaries paid to college coaches.

The Kansas City Star has compiled a list of each state’s governor’s salary and the highest paid head coaches in that state. The coaches win 49-1 with Alaska being the only state where the coach is not paid more than the governor.

Goff’s comment, NFL Predictions: Writers v. Vegas, was a bit longer and examined how difficult it is to predict outcomes in football. I would encourage everyone to click on the link and read what Goff has to say (don’t worry, relative to what I post here, Goff’s entry is quite short).

One last note before I get back to work. I have updated the page listing the NBA team reviews from 2006-07. So far, half the league has been reviewed. And this means, as the update notes, half the league still needs to be discussed. It’s my intention to post, before the next season, a comment on each team. If there is a team you want done first, please let me know.

- DJ

Categories: Sports Econ

4 responses so far ↓

  • don // August 30, 2007 at 8:57 pm

    Milwaukee still in the league? They aren’t in
    either listing of teams (done and will do lists)?
    For penance, say Three Hail Marys and an analysis
    of the Bucks in ‘06-’07.

  • dberri // August 30, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    don,
    Good catch. I added the Bucks to the list. As for the analysis, I will try and get to this next week. Any ideas for a fresh story line?

  • Tim // August 31, 2007 at 7:28 am

    I’m an excited Chicago Bulls fan and would love to see your analysis of the coming season. Questions that occur to me include how much should the Bulls pay to keep Ben Gordon? Can Luol Deng turn into a true superstar? Can ben Wallace regain his superstar status after an off year? Or is he getting old? Will Tyrus Thomas have a breakout year? Did the Bulls overpay for Nocioni? Will Joakim Noah make a difference in his first year? Will Hinrich improve? How much difference does coaching make? How much credit or blame should we give Scott Skiles for the achievements of the Bulls? Oh, and how about Joe Smith? Will he help? Is the conventional wisdom that the Bulls still need
    low post scoring correct? John Hollinger repeatedly says that John Paxson should have traded for Pao Gasol last year, even if it meant giving up Luol Deng — is Hollinger
    correct? (See for example this link:
    http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/columns/story?columnist=hollinger_john&id=2776606 )

  • WSU Alumni // November 28, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    Go Rodney!

Leave a Comment