Who would you rather have, John Wall or Derrick Rose?
Both players played one season of college basketball with John Calipari.
Both players were the first player chosen in their respective draft.
And both players are already considered by many people as star point guards.
But which player is more productive?
The two played each other on Saturday and Rose was somewhat more productive (despite not shooting particularly well). But one game is hardly much of a sample. What we need is a sample that is much, much bigger.
For Rose, we have such a sample. Rose has already played 167 NBA games, so we have some idea what kind of player he has been in the NBA. As for Wall… well, his entire NBA experience only consists of eight games (a sample that is eight times bigger than a single game!). And eight games isn’t much. But I am going to throw out the numbers we have so far (because those are the only numbers we have).
The following table reports what John Wall has done across his first eight NBA games. It also reports what Rose has done this season, what Rose offered last season, and what an average point guard gives an NBA team.
The two players have many similarities. Both players have been below average this season with respect to shooting efficiency and turnovers, about average with respect to rebounds, and above average with respect to assists and getting to the free throw line. The primary difference is that John Wall is very good at getting steals and Rose is below average in this department. As a consequence, Wall has so far been an above average NBA player (although in my conversation with Andres Alvarez and Arturo Galletti yesterday, Andres noted that Wall has been inconsistent).
And Rose…okay, Rose is still about average. Yes, I know. He’s an all-star. He stars in commercials. But his production of wins is about average (something I have noted before). And this is because he has yet to be consistently above average with respect to any aspect of the game (besides taking shots). This year – again, after just eight games — he is offering quite a few assists. This production, though, is offset by poor shooting. If he could offer the assists and better shooting, then he would be above average. And if this happens, I would then say “Rose is now above average”. For now, though, Rose is just average.
His team, though, is better than average. As we can see below, this is primarily because of the play of Joakim Noah, Keith Bogans, and Taj Gibson (a trio that is projected to produce nearly 40 wins). The team is also projected to receive 11.1 wins from Rose and Ronnie Brewer. But the trio of Noah, Bogans and Gibson are leading the way so far (and Noah is easily the most productive player for the Bulls).
As of now the team is projected to win about 54 games. This projection should go up
a. once Carlos Boozer starts to play.
b. if Luol Deng starts producing (as he has done in the past).
If the Bulls do manage to approach 60 wins this year, we can expect Derrick Rose to be considered a star by many more people. After all, Rose is the team’s leading scorer (primarily because he has decided to take the most shots). But if Rose continues to be average, the team’s success will still be about Rose’s teammates.
What about Wall? Unfortunately for John Wall, his teammates are not nearly as productive. As the following table indicates, Wall is on pace to produce 12.0 wins this year. The rest of his team, though, is only on pace to produce 7.0 wins. Yes, without Wall the Wizards could be historically bad.
And remember, Wall eclipses Rose because of Wall’s ability to get steals. If Wall was average with respect to steals, Wall’s WP48 [Wins Produced per 48 minutes] would fall from 0.179 to 0.112 and his projected Wins Produced would fall from 12.0 to 7.5. And the Wizards projected wins would fall from 19.0 to 14.6.
Those steals, though, have happened. And if they continue – and if Wall continues to perform as we have seen so far (and yes, the sample is still just eight games) – then Wall will be above average and the Wizards will approach 20 wins. The team can also be better if Andray Blatche and Yi Jianlian get back to what they were last year. Yes, both players were below average in 2009-10. And yes, I think some fans thought each player was going to get better. But both have been much worse. If each can get back to just being bad, the Wizards might approach 30 wins.
Of course, that assumes every player who has improved stays improved. And that… okay, really we just have eight games. So we really can’t say too much. What we can say is that
- John Wall has been above average (primarily because he is good at getting steals).
- the Wizards have not been very good.
- and the Wizards will need more productive players if the team wishes to above average.
And if Wall stays above average once better teammates arrive – and Rose stays about average – then I think people will see Wall is the better player.
Of course, that is a bunch of ifs. And Wall still has only played eight games (have I mentioned the sample size yet?).
Let me close by noting that neither Wall nor Rose are as productive as the top point guards in the game. Recently Chris Broussard and Ric Bucher debated whether Chris Paul or Deron Williams was the “best” point guard in the game (insider access required). Bucher took the position that Williams is better than Paul. The numbers, though, suggest this isn’t even close. Not only is Paul the most productive point guard (with Rajon Rondo coming in second), Paul is also the most productive player in the game (on a per-minute basis). Meanwhile, Williams is not even the most productive player on his team this year (see the automated WP numbers from Andres Alvarez for each player’s Wins Produced and WP48 this season).
One reason Paul is so productive is that he limits his turnovers. Andres Alvarez reported the following quote from Paul that illustrates his attitude towards turnovers:
“As soon as the game’s over, I want to know how many turnovers I had,” Paul says. “My job is to run the team and get us as many possessions as possible. When I turn the ball over I take possessions away from us.”
Perhaps someday Wall and Rose – who turn the ball over about twice as often as Paul – will adopt the same attitude. And when that happens, we might say that Wall and Rose are among the top point guards in the game.
– DJ
Italian Stallion
November 15, 2010
I agree with the analysis. One counter argument I would offer is that Rose is so explosive on offense, he can literally take a game over. The difference between him and the “great players” is that they are more consistent . But there may be some value in having a player that can be so explosive he can get your team back into a game or win it by himself even if his average performance is not that impressive.
kevin
November 15, 2010
I like Wall a lot more than Rose. Wall is a legitimate point guard while Rose is one of those shoot first point guards, which I hate.
And the thing holding Wall back right now is the turnovers. Once he learns the abilities of his teammates and opponents a little better, the turnovers should drop and the assits tick up a bit more. I really like Wall. His instincts are terrific for such a young player.
Alvy
November 15, 2010
I forget how young John Wall is… I think he will become a much better PG than Rose will. Nevertheless, I’m rooting for Blake Griffin to come on top of the rookie class.
kevin
November 15, 2010
What’s really amazing about Paul is how he well he can avoid turnovers while being so brazen with his ballhandling.
J
November 15, 2010
Prof. Berri – John Wall played at Kentucky, not Memphis.
Nick
November 15, 2010
Both of these point guards are viewed by their own organization (rightly or wrongly) as having to shoulder a good portion of the scoring (read: shooting) load of their respective offenses. It’ll be interesting to see if Derrick Rose’s game changes, and if that change is reflected on his wins produced, once Carlos Boozer makes his Bulls debut, and gives the team another established scorer.
Rick H.
November 15, 2010
Italian Stallion,
What does it mean to “take [over] a game”? Does it mean that he’s athletic enough to shoot the ball in the general vicinity of the rim, and with a high shooting volume? If so, a great majority of NBA players are able to “take [over] a game.” The only difference between Rose and the average point guard is that due to his draft position, salary, and the expectations hoisted upon him, he’d be less likely to be benched were he to take a majority of his team’s shots.
It’s all about perception and the resultant expectations. As a Knick fan, you’ve surely seen Jamal Crawford “take [over] a game.” That doesn’t mean that he’s a valuable basketball player.
dberri
November 15, 2010
Thanks J. I fixed the post.
Tom
November 15, 2010
Website complaint: The tables have been really hard to read lately and don’t scale up when you click on them anymore. Can you go back to the old tables or do something embedded-table-like that it zoom-able and not a picture? Thanks for all the great posts.
Joe
November 15, 2010
I’m with Tom.
It is kind of frustrating. I always have to cut the distance to the screen in half just to read them.
Italian Stallion
November 15, 2010
Rick,
Being athletic enough to create a wide variety of shots that you can make at reasonable rates of success is a talent all on to itself. Most basketball players are physically incapable of doing many of the things that Rose and Wall can do. If they tried, their shooting efficiency would plummet and they’d probably turn the ball over 3 times as often.
On his good nights, Rose can take over a game and have such an enormous positive impact , you could say he was the primary reason the team won.
The problem with many elite athletes like him is that they don’t know where to draw the line between a smart shot and a poor one. So on average they wind up being high volume shooters that aren’t very efficient.
However, I’m not entire convinced that what a player contributes on average is always equal to what he contributes.
Imagine a team that’s so bad it’s expected to win 10 games.
Now image that team with a player that shoots 20 for 20, with 12 boards, 5 steals, 10 assists, and no turnovers on some nights and 0 -20, with 1 rebound, 1 steal, no assists and 11 turnovers and others. On average he sucks. But on his good nights they are going to win a lot of games.
Chicago Tim
November 15, 2010
Why is the WoW network obsessed with Derrick Rose? I’ll admit he is overrated, but according to you he was far from the most overrated player in 2009-10.
https://dberri.wordpress.com/2010/09/01/who-was-the-most-overrated-in-2009-10/
Has something changed since last season? I don’t remember quite so many articles about Rose last year.
https://dberri.wordpress.com/?s=derrick+rose
Is it because he is making so many commercials? Is the rest of the media treating him differently this year, and driving the WoW network bloggers up the wall? Or am I being overly sensitive?
Michael
November 15, 2010
Chris Broussard is killing Ric Bucher in those debates lately.
I’m not sure if Bucher is being forced to take these dumb position or if he really believes them, but either way he hasn’t been faring well!
fricktho
November 15, 2010
I agree Broussard seems to win just about every debate, or just happens to take the side I would argue for.
I agree with I.S. in that Rose has the rare ability to take over a game, but I’ve only ever truly witnessed one player take over a game and that was Lebron against the Pistons in the playoffs where he went off for like 25 straight points and the Pistons didn’t have a single answer for him. Apparently doubling him up the court and forcing the ball out of his hands wasn’t an option. Players have delusions that they can take over a game, and usually just end up hurting their team by taking too many bad shots. Having the ability to either hit contested shots or create uncontested shots is a skill to be sure though.
jbrett
November 15, 2010
Stallion,
On your imaginary player’s BAD nights, you’re going to lose a lot of games. Now, if he could see the bad night shaping up, and alter his style of play–well, he’d be way better than average, I guess.
John Giagnorio
November 15, 2010
I’m a Bulls fan, and I fully support these anti-Rose posts. I doubt it matters though, the people who want to imagine him a superstar will continue to do so regardless of how little the Bulls win. Is Rose the new Allen Iverson?
Italian Stallion
November 15, 2010
jbrett,
>>On your imaginary player’s BAD nights, you’re going to lose a lot of games. <<
That's true, but my assumption was that the overall team sucked anyway. So no matter how badly he played, they were probably going to lose those games anyway.
Nick
November 15, 2010
I’m admittedly a Derrick Rose apologist, but if he keeps getting assists at this rate while getting his turnover’s and Adj. FG% back to his 09-10 rates, he’s certainly an above average point guard, right? In fact, if his eFG% returns to its 09-10 rate, his scoring efficiency would rise as he’s been getting to the free throw line more.
The fact is, it doesn’t make sense to write such a negative post about a player as young as Derrick Rose who is getting assists at a career high rate, and whose main downside this year has been two numbers that are below his career averages. At such a young age, one wouldn’t expect this regression in Rose’s turnover rate and Adj. FG% to last the whole season. You’re not writing Kevin Durant off for his early season shooting woes. Nor are you making posts about how Lebron’s career high turnover rate represents a new decline in his value.
Don’t be surprised when Rose proves himself as an above average win producer in the NBA this year.
Michael
November 16, 2010
On this topic, has anyone else noticed how a lot of the guys the ‘mainstream’ N.B.A observers are high on, but that WoW isn’t (Rudy Gay and Kobe Bryant for example) started the seasons with very high WP48 (both have been over 0.300) which have gradually declined after more inconsistant play?
I wonder if (other than the valuation of scoring obviously) some of the disconnect between ‘conventional wisdom’ and ‘wp wisdoms’ perception of players like these is caused by the casual observer forming opinions based on the positive variance these players can produce, whilst ignoring the lesser performances which regress their overall production back towards the mean. Sort of like a representativeness heuristic based on performance outliers.
dberri
November 16, 2010
Michael,
I think what you are saying has some validity. Allen Iverson did have some amazing games in his career. And one suspects those game dominate the memories of his fans.
kevin
November 16, 2010
“Is Rose the new Allen Iverson?”
I think this is a little unfair. Rose isn’t as bad as Iverson in terms of being oblivious to his teammates needs. However, he is a shoot first point guard and should probably be a 2 instead, if he can’t learn to set up an offense.
todd2
November 16, 2010
For what it’s worth and I haven’t taken the time to look at the numbers yet: steals aren’t necessarily a good thing. Does a player take himself out of position and allow penetration? Are opponents as a result getting higher percentage shots and drawing fouls on interior players? There are generally two mindsets a defender can have: pressuring the ball/playing passing lanes or protecting the basket. It’s difficult to do both.
Rad E. Cool
November 16, 2010
I was expecting more Iverson-like play from Wall, with high steals and point totals, but low FG% and a high number of turnovers. But it looks like his FG%, whilst low, is far better than I would’ve thought and his steals are greater than expected. But it’s the assists that have been the most amazingly unexpected stat, even if it comes with slightly higher turnovers than expected as well.
I don’t know how much my thoughts correlate to the numbers but I remember something about Wall’s projections on this site being very low and probably less than he has performed so far. So I’m just wondering what the most surprising differences between Wall’s projected performance and actual numbers have been (in terms of WP)?
Also, can Wall get some credit for having to try and get assists with teammates with appalling basketball IQs like Blatche, Thornton, McGee, Yi and Young? That’s gotta add a few more turnovers right?
Adam C. Morrison
November 16, 2010
Great article!
Wall looks like a Hall of Fame talent. Rose looks supremely overrated, but we’ll see how much getting Boozer back helps.
jbrett
November 16, 2010
Rad,
The last point is an excellent one. I watched Thornton drive into the lane, get caught in the air, and fire a pass two rows behind the opponents’ coach, no teammates within 20 feet. It was a terrible no-look pass; even worse, he WAS looking. The whole building held its breath, as if everyone were afraid to laugh.
Magic was always my guy–but Wall doesn’t exactly have Worthy and Cooper on the wings, and Kareem to dump the ball into. Could the Wizards be employing extreme measures to hold him down, so they can rack up a few more lottery picks?
reservoirgod
November 17, 2010
I truly believe the Wizards are tanking. You can’t assemble that many bad players w/out intentionally trying to lose. I guess we won’t know for sure until the trade deadline, though.
jbrett
November 17, 2010
I know Robbie O’Malley, of Roblog (and Wizards’ fandom), believes it’s incompetence, based on moves made after the draft. And if you’re not a WoW adherent, the crew they put together might not seem that bad. I’m still on the fence.
Timothy Ward
November 19, 2010
Does anybody ever see how awful the Bulls are when Derrick Rose isn’t on the floor? If he were to get injured tomorrow, the Bulls would win about 30 games. Rose is only a volume shooter because he has inconsistent shooting around him. Before Korver and this year’s Deng, who has been able to shoot 3’s around him? Who has ever been a legitimate post presence for him to pass to? Not only that, but why don’t we analyze his 4th quarter numbers? The 4th quarter is the most competitive quarter of the game and the quarter where stars take over and pseudo-stars go quiet. Back when KG was on the Timberwolves, I bet all his numbers would have put him as one of the very best in the league… far above “average.” In the fourth quarter though, he went to sleep. It’s why they never won anything. I’d like to see a new analysis where only 4th quarter stats are broken down. I bet Rose comes out as one of the most productive players/minute in the league.
Nick
December 23, 2010
Just saying, my earlier post (11/15) sure is looking prescient right about now.
William Caulton
January 25, 2011
And I thought I was the only one saying Bogans is better than Rose.