Although it may not be obvious, most columns posted here have a coherent theme. Today, though, I thought I would just comment on a few stories I have seen this past week.
Immigration Policy and Competitive Balance
Chris Cook of Financial Times makes an interesting connection – see Top clubs triumph on an uneven pitch — between immigration policy in Great Britain and competitive balance in the English Premier League. Specifically, Cook argues that immigration restrictions in England have harmful effects in soccer. The argument draws upon research we noted in The Wages of Wins.
The Cook article also mentions the new book by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski. The book – Soccernomics – will be released in the U.S. in October. It’s already a big hit in England (where it was released last month).
Attractive Quarterbacks Again
About a year ago I published a short article in Play Magazine (from the New York Times) detailing how the physical attractiveness of a quarterback was related to his pay. Research I conducted – with Jennifer VanGilder, Rob Simmons, and Lisle O’Neill – suggested that the symmetry of a quarterback’s face (as noted in our academic paper, we use a measure of attractiveness from Symmeter) has a statistically significant link to a quarterback’s compensation.
This story has once again been noted in the media. Reed Albergotti of the Wall Street Journal asked us to update our analysis. These updates are noted in Cute Quarterbacks? There’s a Stat for That, Too. Katie Leslie of Atlanta Journal Constitution also comments on the story (see Matt Ryan: The NFL’s face of ‘perfection’?).
My Childhood with Ernie Harwell
This past week we all learned that Ernie Harwell has incurable cancer. Harwell was the Tigers announcer for about forty years and his voice is a fond memory from my childhood. About the first twelve years of my life were spent in Michigan, primarily in the city of Detroit. When I was four or five years old, the family’s black and white television set broke. My father decided not to replace the TV, so for the next seven years we had no TV (yes, it was a tragedy). So as my attention turned to sports, it was via the radio that I primarily followed my favorite teams. This means that I spent quite a bit of time listening – like “the house by the side of the road” (here is a list of Harwell’s catchphrases) – to Ernie Harwell. Although I enjoy listening — via the Internet – to Jim Price and Dan Dickerson today, when I think of the Detroit Tigers on the radio I will always think of Harwell (and of course, Paul Carey). So I was very sorry to hear about his illness.
Forecasting the Lions
And now for some more sad news (although not nearly as serious).
Next week the Detroit Lions will begin their 46th season with William Clay Ford as sole owner of the team (and 49th since Ford became team president). Prior to Ford taking over, the Lions won NFL titles in 1935, 1952, 1953, and 1957. The team came to Detroit in 1934, so in 27 years without Ford involved the Lions won four titles. With Ford in charge, the team has won only one playoff game and last year finished 0-16.
A new season, though, is upon us and in football, hope springs eternal before the games begin. In 2007 the Falcons and Dolphins combined to win five games. Last season these two teams – led by new coaches — each finished with eleven wins and made the playoffs.
The Lions enter this season with a new coach and coaching staff. In addition, of the 25 players listed on the team’s offense at the moment, thirteen were not on the team last year (including five new starters). On defense there are even more new faces. Of the 25 players on defense, sixteen are new to Detroit. And at least eight of the eleven starters were not with the Lions last year.
Despite all the new faces, forecasts for the Lions seem quite low. No one seems to think this team has any chance of being good in 2009. It’s almost as if people think the clothes worn in Detroit lose games. After all, the coaches have changed. Many of the players have changed. One would think, then, that at least some of the forecasts would change also. But that hasn’t happened. Every forecast I have seen expects the Lions to be losers in 2009.
At this point I would like to say that there is some statistical model that contradicts the conventional wisdom. But it doesn’t seem to me that any such model exists. In basketball we have data on every player that is somewhat consistent from season to season. Even with such data, surprises still happen. In football, no such data exists for players. Consequently, forecasting football seems quite difficult.
Brian Burke – of Advanced NFL Statistics – has recently had some fun with this point. His Koko Fantasy Ranking highlights how difficult it is to construct a winner in fantasy football.
Phil Taylor at Sports Illustrated also comes clean on this point. His column in the latest issue of Sports Illustrated captures the truth of NFL Forecasts: Trust Us: We’re Wrong.
The words of Burke and Taylor should give some hope to fans of the Lions. There is a possibility the Lions will be good this year. How much of a possibility, though, is unclear to me. And I suspect, everyone else as well.
– DJ
The WoW Journal Comments Policy
Malayalam
September 6, 2009
Thanks for posting this nice article..
mrparker
September 7, 2009
The same people make the playoffs in my fantasy league every season. I think they now some things that the rest of us don’t. BTW, I never make the playoffs
Italian Stallion
September 7, 2009
DB,
I think biases (like pretty faces in football) are pretty common in all areas of life. I saw it throughout my career on Wall St. The most attractive males and females definitely had the upper hand to start.
There are also height and weight biases.
Overweight and short people are definitely at a disadvantage.
If you are a short male, you have to be much better than your tall counterpart to gain an equal amount of respect (at least over the short term). That’s why so many of “us” wind up with personality traits similar to Nate Robinson. LOL. I’m sure he took a lot of shit during his efforts to make the pros.
It shows up in other ways also.
If I stand at a counter without a line but was the first one there, I will never be served first. The server will almost always start with the person with the most imposing physical appearance and force me to actively assert my position or get passed by.
There must be something programmed into human nature to favor attractive people and have preconceived notions about their other abilities based on their appearance alone.
Michael
September 8, 2009
“Cook argues that immigration restrictions in England have harmful effects in soccer.”
As far as I’m concerned thats tough tits. Immigration has been out of control in this country for far too long imo. New Zealand operates a similar ‘skilled only’ approach to immigration and it seems to work well for them. He does have an interesting argument though.
Italian Stallion
September 8, 2009
My view is that you can’t have both a relatively open immigration policy and a strong economic safety net in combination. You must pick one or the other. Otherwise there is a strong incentive for the “least skilled and educated” poor to come to your country. Decades ago, that wasn’t too much of an issue. But the modern economy puts a premium on skills and education. All this in turn puts a drain on available resources (at least in the short term – like perhaps one generation) . Even worse, some politicians use all these unskilled and uneducated people to gain political power and corporations look to exploit them economically – all at the expense of existing citizens.
Mo
September 9, 2009
Brian Burke’s Koko ranking doesn’t highlight anything. If Koko is successful, then yes, it does highlight it. The FFlibrarian shows how hard it is and that there’s a bit of luck involved.
http://www.fflibrarian.com/2009/02/accuracy-analysis-for-2008.html