Who is the most overrated player in the NBA?
To answer this question, we need to first define what we mean by “overrated”. Dictionary.com tells us that the word “overrated” means: to rate or appraise too highly; overestimate
The word “high” is a relative term. To argue that something is “too high” or “too low” requires a reference point. Actually, to be precise, you need two points of reference.
At Huffington Post, the two reference points were points scored per game and Wins Produced. Such a comparison makes sense when we consider
1. Scoring dominates the perceptions of performance but does not capture a player’s contribution to wins, and
2.Wins Produced captures a players contribution to wins, but is not always consistent with perceptions of performance.
Although this comparison is certainly reasonable (at least, I think this is reasonable), one can construct a list of “overrated” players with other measures.
For example, perceptions of performance can also be captured with two different “advanced” metrics. The first — NBA Efficiency (reported at NBA.com) — is perhaps the oldest “advanced” measure of player performance. The calculation of this measure –as reported below – as quite simple.
NBA Efficiency = Points + Rebounds + Steals + Assists + Blocked Shots – All Missed Shots – Turnovers
Although the word “efficiency” is in the name, the NBA’s metric – as explained HERE –actually rewards inefficiency. In other words, an inefficient scorer can increase his NBA Efficiency by simply taking more shots. As long as he is successful on 33% of his shots from two-point range, and 25% of his shots from behind the arc, more field goal attempts results in a higher NBA Efficiency value. Players (as is often noted) are primarily rewarded for scoring, not for shooting efficiency. Consequently, the NBA Efficiency measure – which fails to punish effectively inefficient shooting – ends up being quite consistent with popular perception since more inefficient scoring does lead people to think a player is better.
When we employ NBA Efficiency in the construction of our list of most overrated, we do see some changes (relative to what was reported at Huffington Post). Chris Kaman – who was somewhat inefficient as a scorer last year (and not exceptional at anything besides taking shots) – now leads the way. And Monta Ellis – who topped the rankings when points per game was employed — is now ranked 4th.
Other changes include some new names. Brook Lopez, LaMarcus Aldridge, and Boris Diaw – who did not appear in the scoring list — now appear in the top 10. And Danny Granger, Eric Gordon, and Devin Harris – who were in the top 10 when scorers were examined – are not in the top 15 when we consider NBA Efficiency. All of these players would still be thought of as overrated by either approach. But how much they are overrated does change with our choice of metrics.
And our choice is not restricted to scoring and NBA Efficiency. The latter measure is not often thought of as very “advanced”. This metric essentially adds together a player’s positive actions and subtracts off the negative. What happens if we turn to a measure that attempts to weight each player’s actions?
The most popular weighted measure is John Hollinger’s Player Efficiency Rating (PER). The simple version (okay, much simpler) of the PER metric – Game Score (discussed HERE)– indicates the basic weights employed.
Game Score = Points + 0.4*Made Field Goals – 0.7*Field Goal Attempts – 0.4*Free Throws Missed + 0.7*Offensive Rebounds + 0.3*Defensive Rebounds + Steals + 0.7*Assists + 0.7*Blocked Shots – 0.4* Personal Fouls – Turnovers
Game Score and NBA Efficiency have a 0.99 correlation (as has been reported before). PER is a per-minute metric, and it has a 0.99 correlation with Game Score per-minute (this has also been reported before). And none of these measures do a very good job of explaining wins (explanatory power is less than 40% — a point made in Stumbling on Wins).
The primary reason behind these high correlations (and lack of explanatory power) is that each of these formulas suffers from the same problem. Yes, each of these measures – and this observation includes PER (as noted HERE) – fails to penalize a player properly for inefficient scoring.
Again – like PPG and NBA Efficiency – PER does tell us about popular perception while not telling us as much about a player’s contribution to wins. And this means we can also use PER to construct another list of the most overrated players in the game.
Before we get to the results, though, we need to note that since PER is a per-minute measure our second reference point has to be WP48 [Wins Produced per 48 minutes]. Despite this change, we still see some familiar names. In fact, each of the players ranked in the top 10 of the overrated PER list appears in the list for scorers and/or the list constructed for NBA Efficiency.
The top player on the PER list, though, is a new overrated champion. Al Harrington – who recently signed with the Denver Nuggets – is the most overrated player when PER is compared to WP48.
So who is the Most Overrated? Well, the answer is not surprising. Economists often say that “it depends”. And that is the case here. Who is most overrated depends upon the two measures you consider.
Regular readers of The Wages of Wins Journal know that an overrated list – as the following two posts indicate – after the 2007-08 and 2008-09 season (and they also know much of the text for this year’s list was taken from these posts).
Who was the Most Overrated in 2008-09?
Who was the Most Overrated in 2007-08?
Each of these posts made an effort to combine the rankings one sees from scoring, NBA Efficiency, and PERs. Such an approach is appealing to those who want “the answer”. But upon further review, such an approach is ad hoc nonsense. In other words, just combining the lists is not a reasonable approach (at least, I no longer thinks so). Sometimes we don’t get “the answer” (as people who sign Allen Iverson realize – okay, that was cheap). Sometimes it is okay to have more than one answer (and of course, sometimes that is not okay — yes, it depends).
Let me close by noting that one can see a discussion of past seasons in Chapter 10 of The Wages of Wins. For more on NBA Efficiency, PER, and Game Score, one is referred to Stumbling on Wins (as well as an article I wrote with JC Bradbury and a forthcoming book chapter I have written – for an academic collection – on NBA metrics).
– DJ
P.S. One can also see more on the metrics mentioned here in the following posts:
NBA Efficiency: Do We Overvalue Rebounds? (November 9, 2006).
PER: A Comment on the Player Efficiency Rating (November 17, 2006)
Game Score: Marvin Williams Makes a Hypothetical Deal (December 16, 2007)
Chicago Tim
September 1, 2010
As a Chicago fan, it’s painful to see Derrick Rose’s name on a couple of those lists, but he is still a couple of years short of his peak, he is somewhat productive at an important position, and he could still grow into his reputation. If he doesn’t substantially improve this year, though, I’ll be really worried.
I know that for the international game, they claim they really, really need shooters to deal with the zone. Furthermore, the three point line is shorter in the international game, which again increases the value of good outside shooters. Is there any validity to those arguments? Could outside scoring be worth significantly more in the international game?
Nick
September 1, 2010
@Chicago Tim:
I don’t think that outside shooting would be MORE valuable (per shot). But I would think it would be a case where it’s EASIER for a player to contribute positive numbers based primarily on 3-pt shooting.
i.e. A player like Kyle Korver might be able to produce +0.1 WP/48 because he can shoot 45% from 3pt range, rather than having a 0.05 WP/48 because he can only hit 38% from 3pt in the NBA. Of course since every player theoretically should get a 3pt% bump, the effect would be minimized, until you get to the truly elite shooters. To note, these are all arbitrary numbers I used here.
dberri
September 1, 2010
The point Ben Gulker made that there is only one ball still seems important to me. No matter how the game is constructed, if there is only one ball, you don’t need five players primarily focused on scoring on the court. Someone has to be thinking about the other aspects of the game for you to be successful.
robbieomalley
September 1, 2010
Have you ever looked at Hollingers estimated wins added? This is probably the most baffling statistic showcased on all the internets. You can add up the wins and it doesn’t come close on several occasions. You’d think Hollinger could at least eye ball this. The New Jersey Nets have an EWA of 25ish wins if I remember correctly. And that’s above what a team of replacement players would project to produce. They only won 12! He had Brook Lopez winning more than 12 games himself!
BV
September 1, 2010
Perhaps there’s a reason why Hollinger is writing for espn.com and you’re slaving away writing on the underbelly of the internet here. Something to think about.
Dante
September 1, 2010
I am so surprised that Kobe is not on the list; you’re hate for the LA Lakers and Mr. Bryant are so well-known. I’m almost disappointed that this post didn’t give me a chance to hate on your stupid WP even more than I already do.
Dante
September 1, 2010
@BV Underbelly, haha.
Schermeister
September 1, 2010
@BV
Cause ESPN has the best writers and everything haha. Sarcasm
Just like all the GMs must know more then we do, I mean look at their incrediable body or maybe “upper belly” of work. There picks are awesome for both nba and nefl. I think they get about 55% right for nfl games, too bad they dont go game by game picks for nba!
some dude
September 1, 2010
Aaron Brooks is the most overrated player in the NBA because he won most improved player award despite not really improving.
Most of the people on the list seem to make sense. Of course, no one cares about Kaman so he’s only overrated by the stats, not by actual people.
What about a list of WP overrated players? I think David Lee takes the cake on that one!
Michael
September 2, 2010
I think Kobe has become the most overrated player in the league.
marc
September 2, 2010
i second that.
Leroy Smith
September 2, 2010
@ BV and Dante,
I can’t believe that some people here are kind of implying that just because someone writes for ESPN that makes them somehow better than someone who is less popular. That’s like saying that Paris Hilton is a better accress than Meryl Streep because she is more “popular” and everyone knows Paris.
Look people, just because someone writes for ESPN does not make them infallible. And just because someone is not the most popular at what they do does not mean that they are not good at it. Is Britney Spears the best singer in the world?
As far as Kobe, he is not on this list because he is very productive, just not as productive as some of his most loyal suporters think he is.
Leroy Smith
September 2, 2010
@Michael and Marc,
Kobe is not the most overrated player as long as people think Melo is a franchise player. Kobe is a good rebounder as a SG and is more likely to play great on-ball defense. Melo is onlo good at taking lots of shots.
arturogalletti
September 2, 2010
@Michael and Marc,
Kobe was the 4th best SG with more than 400 MP last season according to the automated wins produced numbers (Wade,Iggy,Manu then Kobe) and 28th overall. So he should not be on the most overrated list. He is not close to being the best player in the league or at his position (never mind that he plays on one of the best teams).
nerdnumbers
September 2, 2010
@arturo, Michael and Marc
As Arturo points out Kobe is not actually that overrated. He is often called greatest of all time. A lot of this has to do with our natural tendency to compare things right next to them. Kobe has been a top 5 SG most of his career. So was Jordan. Hence it is easy to try and call them similar, when in reality their skill difference was huge. I’ll be posting an article on the top SGs either next week or the week after (I forced Iggy up to SF but those other players are all on the list).
marc
September 3, 2010
Thanks, i’d love to see that nerdnumbers.
@leroy and arturo:
I didn’t mean to imply he’s an unporductive player, but he’s nowhere
near his reputation.
His defense is overblown too, anyway.
Michael
September 3, 2010
I appreciate that Kobe is a good player. As Arturo says being the 4th best shooting guard in your 30s with injuries is obviously good. But people are starting to seriously suggest that he is the best player ever. That’s why I think he’s the most overrated, even though he is above average.
pterradacto
September 4, 2010
who the f*ck cares about PER? Seriously, I believe that i could beat John Hollinger in Basketball. And I’m just an underground rapper. PER, have you ever played basketball. Stats do not count win your winning.