In this forum I have mentioned a few times different measures of performance we introduce in The Wages of Wins. It occurred to me that perhaps the stories I tell here would be easier to follow if I proved a few more details on the measures we introduced.
Now detailing how we measure Wins Produced for NBA players, or Net Points and Wins for quarterbacks in the NFL, is a bit difficult given the limited space on a blog. And that is one reason we wrote the book. I can say that these measures are quite accurate, and as we note in the excerpt to Chapter Six, if you sum the Wins Produced created by the player’s on an NBA team you will get a number quite close to a team’s actual wins.
So if you wish to understand Wins Produced or Net Points you will have to buy the book. We did create two simple measures – QB Score in football and Win Score for basketball players – that I think can be explained.
Before I explain each, it is important to note why it was necessary to create new metrics of player performance. Sports provide very detailed measures of worker productivity. And these measures can be used to estimate the productivity of different workers or players. To do this, though, you have to link what the player has done – in other words, his statistics – to what the player was trying to accomplish – in other words, win games.
Measures like the NBA Efficiency metric, or the NFL’s quarterback rating measure, do not connect the player’s statistics to win. With a bit of work, though, we were able to take this step and hence we can measure how many wins a player produces in the NBA, or how many net points and wins a quarterback creates in football. Once we did this, though, we thought it might be useful to create very simple measures that everyone could calculate.
Let’s begin with football. We were able to estimate the relative value of a Yard Gained – which includes rushing and passing yards – Plays – which includes passing attempts, sacks, and rushing attempts – and Turnovers – which includes interceptions and fumbles. Our research indicates that one play – in terms of wins and points – is worth about three times the value of a single yard. A turnover is worth about 50 yards. Now these values – 3 and 50 – are not exact. But it is close enough to give you a quick estimate of a quarterback’s effectiveness. Given this, QB Score – which is both less complex and more accurate than the NFLs’ quarterback rating system — is calculated as follows:
Yards – 3 X Plays – 50 X Turnovers
Now let’s turn to basketball. Again the methodology is the same. Determine the relative value of each statistic. Our research indicates that the relative value of a point, rebound, steal, turnover, and field goal attempt – in absolute terms – is equal. Assists, blocked shots, free throw attempts, and personal fouls – again in absolute terms – are each worth less than a point, a rebound, etc… To keep it simple, one can argue that each of these latter stats is worth ½ a point, rebound, etc… Now the ½ value is not exact, but using ½ keeps it simple and we find one gains very little using the exact relative value. In other words, player rankings do not change very much when you use the exact values.
So given this argument, one can measure performance with this simple calculation, which we call Win Score.
Points + Rebounds + Steals + ½Assists + ½Blocked Shots – Field Goal Attempts – Turnovers – ½Free Throw Attempts – ½Personal Fouls
IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS WINS PRODUCED. Sorry to interrupt this post with a bit of shouting, but I noticed people were heading for this post and not always understanding what was being said. For a brief discussion of the difference between Win Score and Wins Produced – and there is a difference — please go here. Or for a good discussion of what our methods mean for analysis of player performance in the NBA, click on Malcolm Gladwell’s comments here and here. And for a discussion I offered summarizing what we are saying about the NBA please click here and here.
And now back to the rest of the original post…
To get at Wins Produced you have to use the exact values, and make a few adjustments – such as adjusting for position played – which we note in the book. Still, Win Score is sufficient to give you a quick snapshot of a player’s performance. And it is especially useful if you wish to know if a player is playing better or worse than he did before.
Hopefully being able to see these metrics will help people understand the stories we tell. Again, further details are offered in the book. I should emphasize that these details do not include any math – in fact we avoided using math in our book. Instead, in what we hope is simple language, we explained how we calculate Wins Produced and Net Points. And from these explanations, we also derive Win Score and QB Score.
– DJ
125 responses so far ↓
Pio Szamel // May 22, 2006 at 4:22 pm
I can’t comment on your NBA metrics, since I don’t follow basketball. But your QB metric is honestly worthless. A player-rating is meant to measure the value of a player in a way that is at least nominally independent from the performance of the team as a whole. Your measure doesn’t even attempt to seperate the QB from the rest of the team – you don’t even seperate passing yards (which the QB has SOME responsibility for, though much still depends on his recievers, his O-line, and the defense) from rushing yards, which have almost nothing to do with the QB. And it isn’t exactly the QB’s fault when his running back fumbles.
For real football metrics, go to footballoutsiders.com. Their stats are great at seperating out the value an individual player creates, and at creating team ratings that accurately _predict_ performance, instead of just reflecting stats back. Their off-season prediction models predicted the resurgence of Tampa Bay last season and the emergence of San Diego the season before. In other words, their site is more than just a gimmick by an economist who hasn’t bothered to do any background research.
dberri // May 22, 2006 at 4:54 pm
Pio,
Let me try and provide more details regarding QB Score. When we calculate this metric we only consider the stats credited to the quarterback. So we only consider the quarterback’s passing yards, interceptions, fumbles, rushing yards,etc…
What you note about differentiating the quarterback from his teammates we also state in the book. Quarterbacks do not play by themselves. They need receivers to catch, lineman to block, etc… Given how dependent quarterbacks are on their teammates it is not surprising that the performance of quarterbacks, measured via whatever statistics people generally use, tends to be very inconsistent.
Finally, I like footballoutsiders.com as well.
Jay Howard // May 23, 2006 at 8:49 am
Please stop the absurd practive of adjusting your NBA statistics for position. Positions in the NBA are becoming so arbitrary that to try to base a statistical analysis on what letter(s) sits beside a players name on the roster is as ludicrous as adjusting for jersey number.
What position does Jason Terry play? Iverson? Duncan? Antoine Walker? Tracy McGrady? LeBron?
Your system is flawed at best. It may be the most accurate algorithm yet to measure a player’s value, but that’s not saying much. Hey, I have the most accurate estimate yet of how big the universe is. And?
Mark Foley // May 23, 2006 at 11:55 am
Hi … after reading some of your blog, I’m looking forward to reading the book. My question is how you account for the endogeneity of a player’s “Win Score” with respect to his composition of teammates? That is, presumably a player’s skills will be complements for some of his teammates’ skills (Kidd’s passing and Vince Carter’s leaping, e.g.), and substitutes for others. And if a player’s Win Score depends on his teammates, then is it reasonable to compare Win Scores across teams?
Mark Foley
AC // May 23, 2006 at 1:58 pm
I love this idea, and I think it can come down to specific formula. But there is more to consider, including player smarts and reputation as I don’t believe the relative value of a point – in absolute terms – is equal.
As a former basketball player, one of my strengths was to get the other team’s “best player” to foul me. I was even skilled enough to sacrifice a lay-up to draw a foul and then hit two foul shots. By the fourth quarter, the team’s star would either be on the bench or super-cautious defensively, given us a tremendous late game advantage. I feel like this contribution lead to a weaken defense and would have given me more Win Score than your formula would give me, since there are minute factors like this that could come in play even in the NBA.
Also being a “smart player” comes into play when fouling a player. I would like to think there are players, like myself, that make “smart fouls” that save 2 points more than it gives 2 points to the other team. (i.e. stopping a fast break at half-court.) This could sway the Win Score too.
Not to mention reputation too. For instance, Shaq, and (I’m guessing) teams probably shoot more inaccurate outside shots when he’s in the game which would give his team an advantage, because they are less likely to drive the lane. This also would decrease Shaq’s opportunities at blocked shots that could raise his Win Score number too. I’m sure for a player like Allen Iverson, an opposing coach would put his best defensive player in the game to cover him (sacrificing the regular starter who’s more offensively skilled.) The affects of this would be tremendous as well.
Harold Almonte // May 24, 2006 at 3:01 pm
I think your WinScore value is a less accurate form of Tendex or PER ratings commonly used by NBA analysts. Its difficult to know the real win or possesion value of a rebound, steal, block, turnover, etc., and we all know that scoring is only the half of the game, you need to defend the opponent´s score too, but I don´t agree with the fractions assigned to these stats.
Neither 82games.com have solved that basketball code, that´s why everybody likes to go empiric and just copy winners teams patterns.
The Disappointment Zone » Blog Archive » Ilgauskas, Gooden, and Varejao // August 14, 2006 at 10:26 am
[...] We can use another Wages of Wins metric, Win Score, to further contextualize these statistics. The average big man (PF or C) last season had a per-minute Win Score of .22. Last season Ilgauskas had a per-minute Win Score of .256. Varejao had a per-minute Win Score of .27. And Gooden had a Win Score of .29. Though Gooden didn’t lead in any of the statistics above, he was nonetheless a very productive player and all players performed above average. [...]
Cavaliers roster analysis: Part I « The Disappointment Zone // August 28, 2006 at 1:11 pm
[...] Is there hope that Snow will return to form (form being a slightly above average point guard)? The outlook is grim. Here are Snow’s Win Scores per minute for the last four seasons. [...]
Natalie Gulbis // September 30, 2006 at 10:00 am
quarterback
Interesting post. I came across this blog by accident, but it was a good accident. I have now bookmarked your blog for future use. Best wishes. Natalie Gulbis.
sagaliba // October 26, 2006 at 11:07 am
For basketball, I would propose an even simpler method (not that many 1/2s):
Points + Rebounds + Steals + Assists + Blocked Shots – Field Goal Missed – Turnovers – Free Throw Missed – ½Personal Fouls
dberri // October 26, 2006 at 2:18 pm
Sagaliba,
You have proposed Robert Bellotti’s Points Created model. This model, very similar to NBA Efficiency, also overvalues inefficient scorers.
NBA Draft Goes Statistical « The Secret Weapon // June 28, 2007 at 10:19 am
[...] included an array of statistical tools, including per 40 minute numbers, NBA Efficiency, Dave Berri’s Win Score, and John Hollinger’s PER. While it’s nice to have such measures available, [...]
The Return of the Kings « The Wages of Wins Journal // September 3, 2007 at 9:44 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Doing the Same Thing in Atlanta? « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 5, 2007 at 11:19 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
After the Answer « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 10, 2007 at 11:34 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Melo, King James, and the Human Highlight Film « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 24, 2007 at 9:24 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Starbury Loses His Star « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 15, 2007 at 1:00 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Top NBA Trio « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 20, 2007 at 12:15 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Magical Magic and the Ariza Trade « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 21, 2007 at 1:00 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Evaluating Future Stars in Baseball and Basketball « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 27, 2007 at 12:52 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
FAQs and Position Averages « The Wages of Wins Journal // December 13, 2007 at 4:25 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Reviewing the Northwest Division « The Wages of Wins Journal // December 19, 2007 at 12:09 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Missing MVP « The Wages of Wins Journal // December 23, 2007 at 1:46 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Reviewing Every Player on Every Team « The Wages of Wins Journal // December 26, 2007 at 12:06 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Joe Johnson is an All-Star? « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 1, 2008 at 1:08 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
More Analysis at the Midpoint and a Brief Comment on the Gasol Trade « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 4, 2008 at 12:42 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Nancy // February 4, 2008 at 5:43 pm
my opinion the guy who completed 6 more passes is better because that is 6 more opportunities to move the chains and 6 more opportunities for his guys to get some yards after catch and 6 more times the ball went to his guy as oppoesed to not
good post and I like the idea for a new rating system
The Unsurprising Hornets « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 2, 2008 at 5:55 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Better Barry « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 9, 2008 at 12:29 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Riley Scouts Eric Gordon? « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 9, 2008 at 11:20 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Kobe and T-Mac Again « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 17, 2008 at 11:54 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Missing and Missing and Missing in Minnesota « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 15, 2008 at 4:59 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Richard Jefferson and the Decline of the New Jersey Nets « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 5, 2008 at 4:32 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Does George Karl Not Understand Game Pace? and Introducing Distortion Score « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 8, 2008 at 8:53 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The 2008 NBA Draft Preview « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 28, 2008 at 8:28 am
[...] an approximation for individual player contributions towards Wins Produced, and call the results Win Scores. Their analysis lays out a simple formula for player evaluation that can be applied to any common [...]
Game Three Thoughts: The Amazing Vujacic and What a Lakers Dynasty Would Mean for Most NBA Fans « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 12, 2008 at 11:45 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Game Four Thoughts: Ray Allen for MVP « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 13, 2008 at 3:11 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
They Got Next: Analyzing the WNBA « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 15, 2008 at 11:47 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Bogut Economy « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 10, 2008 at 5:59 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
At Least We Have the Bucks « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 18, 2008 at 8:39 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Pareto Prediction and the Top Trios in 2007-08 « The Wages of Wins Journal // August 5, 2008 at 8:46 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Miles File « The Wages of Wins Journal // August 25, 2008 at 10:02 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Tom // September 9, 2008 at 6:56 am
I have always thought such formulas overestimate the FT shooting accuracy. Here is why :
Simple example:
- player A makes a FG, his WinScore is “1″
- playerB makes a FG, draws a foul but misses the extra free throw, his winscore is “0.5″
However, player B did score 2 points using only one possession as did player A. So his rating should not be worse than A’s, if not better.
So if you are a woeful FT shooter (Shaq’s name comes to mind), being unstoppable, drawing fouls and getting to the charity stripe will count against your winscore if you can’t shoot at least 50% from the line.
Then of course, not all free throws come after a FG, but those should be treated separately (bonus when converting them, no malus when not)
A Little Bit of Hindsight Bias: Reviewing the Drafting of Sam Bowie « The Wages of Wins Journal // September 12, 2008 at 6:16 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Darko Milicic is No Tyson Chandler « The Wages of Wins Journal // September 18, 2008 at 9:54 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Could a Focus on Free Throw Shooting Have Saved Sam Vincent? « The Wages of Wins Journal // September 23, 2008 at 7:17 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Beat LA? Dream On « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 7, 2008 at 7:46 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Best Point Guard in Sacramento Now has Bigger Problems « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 6, 2008 at 11:24 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Knicks Look to the Distant Future « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 23, 2008 at 5:40 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Bad Days in Sacramento and the Hawks Sort of Soar « The Wages of Wins Journal // January 16, 2009 at 6:51 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Assigning Blame in Phoenix « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 6, 2009 at 12:26 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Mr. Morrison Comes to LA « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 8, 2009 at 6:08 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Boots (written on Tuesday, February 10) « The Sports Report // February 10, 2009 at 3:27 pm
[...] Win Score per 48 minutes: [...]
King James and Kobe « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 15, 2009 at 9:44 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Back to Battier « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 18, 2009 at 9:51 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Helping the Least Productive Number One Pick « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 19, 2009 at 11:50 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Self-Inflicted Wounds in Sacramento « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 22, 2009 at 11:40 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Billups Trade As It Was, As It Is Imagined, and As It Can Be « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 24, 2009 at 9:43 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Can Starbury Help Boston Repeat? « The Wages of Wins Journal // February 26, 2009 at 9:37 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
When can Barack Obama Legitimately Visit with the Bulls in the White House? « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 1, 2009 at 8:53 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Miller Metric and Finding Talent in Utah « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 3, 2009 at 11:26 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Playoff Basketball in Charlotte? « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 5, 2009 at 7:44 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Cost of Throwing Away Free Throws « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 8, 2009 at 11:25 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Same Three Year Gasol Plan in Memphis « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 10, 2009 at 8:43 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Bob Newhart, Danny Granger, and Group Therapy in Indiana « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 12, 2009 at 10:11 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
An Instant Analysis of the 2009 NCAA Tournament « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 15, 2009 at 4:56 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Drafting Auerbach « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 19, 2009 at 8:22 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Aging Billups and Telling Stories « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 22, 2009 at 10:18 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Yes, the Knicks have Improved « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 26, 2009 at 6:26 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
There is Not Much Difference Between Danny Granger and Kobe Bryant? « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 29, 2009 at 10:57 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Which Dunleavy Has Underperformed? « The Wages of Wins Journal // March 31, 2009 at 8:40 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Greg Oden or Kevin Durant? « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 2, 2009 at 7:22 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Assisted Thoughts « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 5, 2009 at 9:13 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
San Antonio Moves from Possible Contender to a Likely Early Vacation « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 7, 2009 at 8:45 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Marvin Webster Passes Away « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 9, 2009 at 8:21 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Other Better Bynum « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 9, 2009 at 8:46 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
An Award for Joel Przybilla? « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 12, 2009 at 6:50 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Looking Again at Implicit Bias in the NBA « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 15, 2009 at 12:17 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Picking the First Round of the 2009 NBA Playoffs « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 16, 2009 at 8:22 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Jamal Crawford is Unlucky? « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 23, 2009 at 10:07 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Thoughts on the 2009 NFL Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 26, 2009 at 4:07 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
An Average Rose « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 28, 2009 at 8:05 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
How Sportswriters are Like Coaches: Explaining the Vote for Rookie of the Year « The Wages of Wins Journal // April 30, 2009 at 3:18 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Picking the Second Round of the 2009 NBA Playoffs « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 3, 2009 at 7:26 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
How About a Few More MVP Votes for Chris Paul? « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 7, 2009 at 9:55 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The MVP on Each Team and a Comparison of Kobe and Flash « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 10, 2009 at 7:42 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Danny Granger is the Most Improved? « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 12, 2009 at 6:47 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The WoW All-NBA Teams « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 14, 2009 at 6:02 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Picking the Conference Finals and Playoff Science « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 18, 2009 at 8:01 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Has Glen ‘Big Baby’ Davis played his way out of Boston? « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 21, 2009 at 12:22 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Ranking Every Player in the History of the Utah Jazz « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 24, 2009 at 8:53 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
A Comment on the NBA Draft and Some Cutting and Pasting « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 26, 2009 at 7:14 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Ranking Every Player for the Boston Celtics since 1977 « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 28, 2009 at 11:03 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Ranking Every Player in the History of the Los Angeles Lakers since 1977 « The Wages of Wins Journal // May 31, 2009 at 3:12 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Fooled by Randomness, the NBA Playoffs, and the TrueHoop Smackdown « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 3, 2009 at 12:33 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Superman, Shaq, Magic History, and Reader Comments « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 7, 2009 at 3:18 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Evaluating Jordan Hill « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 11, 2009 at 3:09 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Superstar Search in the NBA Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 14, 2009 at 7:27 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Winning the TrueHoop Stat Geek Smackdown « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 16, 2009 at 8:40 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Pondering Potential First Round Point Guards « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 18, 2009 at 7:28 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Trading Before the Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 24, 2009 at 3:07 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Quick Thoughts on the 2009 NBA Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 26, 2009 at 3:02 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Detroit Refuses Rondo? « The Wages of Wins Journal // June 29, 2009 at 3:59 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Gordon and Villanueva? « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 2, 2009 at 10:16 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Artest for Ariza? « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 7, 2009 at 10:52 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
An Interesting Path Back To Contention for the Mavericks « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 9, 2009 at 7:39 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Dashing Hope in Toronto « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 12, 2009 at 9:47 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Should Kuester Rent or Buy? « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 14, 2009 at 6:33 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Reasons to Sign Iverson « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 16, 2009 at 3:30 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Magic and Pistons Go Different Directions « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 19, 2009 at 3:31 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Beasley or Boozer? « The Wages of Wins Journal // July 30, 2009 at 7:05 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
A Very Short Post on the Magic-Bird Era « The Wages of Wins Journal // August 20, 2009 at 8:13 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Michael Ray Richardson and Kobe « The Wages of Wins Journal // August 21, 2009 at 2:02 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Are the Wizards one of the ten best teams in the NBA? « The Wages of Wins Journal // August 27, 2009 at 8:00 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Stephen Jackson Wants a Better Team « The Wages of Wins Journal // September 2, 2009 at 9:29 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Mathletics Part III: Basketball // September 15, 2009 at 11:21 am
[...] to the linear weight ratings of NBA Efficiency Rating, Player Efficiency Rating (PER), and Win Scores/Wins Produced. Because they’re based on the box score, we know that these ratings do not capture the entire [...]
KG and Boston Try One More Time « The Wages of Wins Journal // September 30, 2009 at 1:44 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Should We Expect the Lakers to Repeat? « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 5, 2009 at 8:17 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Contending Spurs Fail to Miss Blair « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 9, 2009 at 9:40 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Will the Kings be Crowned the Worst Team in 2009-10? « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 18, 2009 at 3:30 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Previewing the Year of the Super Teams « The Wages of Wins Journal // October 27, 2009 at 2:29 pm
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Chicago Bears News » Explaining Bucks Diary Game Stats // October 30, 2009 at 1:06 pm
[...] primary tool is a basketball metric called “Win Score”. Win Score is nothing more than a condensed version of a traditional box score, with then end [...]
Should Everyone By Unhappy with the New Contract of Rajon Rondo? « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 2, 2009 at 11:58 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
The Wall Street Journal and the Best Starting Line-Ups « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 6, 2009 at 10:57 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]
Bynum Comes Back « The Wages of Wins Journal // November 13, 2009 at 8:27 am
[...] Simple Models of Player Performance [...]